* External authors



A Domain-Agnostic Approach for Characterization of Lifelong Learning Systems

Megan M. Baker*

Alexander New*

Mario Aguilar-Simon*

Ziad Al-Halah*

Sébastien M. R. Arnold*

Ese Ben-Iwhiwhu*

Andrew P. Brna*

Ethan Brooks*

Ryan C. Brown*

Zachary Daniels*

Anurag Daram*

Fabien Delattre*

Ryan Dellana*

Eric Eaton*

Haotian Fu*

Kristen Grauman*

Jesse Hostetler*

Shariq Iqbal*

Cassandra Kent*

Nicholas Ketz*

Soheil Kolouri*

George Konidaris*

Dhireesha Kudithipudi*

Seungwon Lee*

Michael L. Littman*

Sandeep Madireddy*

Jorge A. Mendez*

Eric Q. Nguyen*

Christine D. Piatko*

Praveen K. Pilly*

Aswin Raghavan*

Abrar Rahman*

Santhosh Kumar Ramakrishnan*

Neale Ratzlaff*

Andrea Soltoggio*

Peter Stone

Indranil Sur*

Zhipeng Tang*

Saket Tiwari*

Kyle Vedder*

Felix Wang*

Zifan Xu*

Angel Yanguas-Gil*

Harel Yedidsion*

Shangqun Yu*

Gautam K. Vallabha*

* External authors



Despite the advancement of machine learning techniques in recent years, state-of-the-art systems lack robustness to “real world” events, where the input distributions and tasks encountered by the deployed systems will not be limited to the original training context, and systems will instead need to adapt to novel distributions and tasks while deployed. This critical gap may be addressed through the development of “Lifelong Learning” systems that are capable of (1) Continuous Learning, (2) Transfer and Adaptation, and (3) Scalability. Unfortunately, efforts to improve these capabilities are typically treated as distinct areas of research that are assessed independently, without regard to the impact of each separate capability on other aspects of the system. We instead propose a holistic approach, using a suite of metrics and an evaluation framework to assess Lifelong Learning in a principled way that is agnostic to specific domains or system techniques. Through five case studies, we show that this suite of metrics can inform the development of varied and complex Lifelong Learning systems. We highlight how the proposed suite of metrics quantifies performance trade-offs present during Lifelong Learning system development — both the widely discussed Stability-Plasticity dilemma and the newly proposed relationship between Sample Efficient and Robust Learning. Further, we make recommendations for the formulation and use of metrics to guide the continuing development of Lifelong Learning systems and assess their progress in the future.

Related Publications

Benchmarking Reinforcement Learning Techniques for Autonomous Navigation

ICRA, 2023
Zifan Xu*, Bo Liu*, Xuesu Xiao*, Anirudh Nair*, Peter Stone

Deep reinforcement learning (RL) has broughtmany successes for autonomous robot navigation. However,there still exists important limitations that prevent real-worlduse of RL-based navigation systems. For example, most learningapproaches lack safety guarantees; and learned na…

Learning Perceptual Hallucination for Multi-Robot Navigation in Narrow Hallways

ICRA, 2023
Jin-Soo Park*, Xuesu Xiao*, Garrett Warnell*, Harel Yedidsion*, Peter Stone

While current systems for autonomous robot navigation can produce safe and efficient motion plans in static environments, they usually generate suboptimal behaviors when multiple robots must navigate together in confined spaces. For example, when two robots meet each other i…

Reward (Mis)design for autonomous driving

Artificial Intelligence, 2023
W. Bradley Knox*, Alessandro Allievi*, Holger Banzhaf*, Felix Schmitt*, Peter Stone

This article considers the problem of diagnosing certain common errors in reward design. Its insights are also applicable to the design of cost functions and performance metrics more generally. To diagnose common errors, we develop 8 simple sanity checks for identifying flaw…

  • HOME
  • Publications
  • A Domain-Agnostic Approach for Characterization of Lifelong Learning Systems


Shape the Future of AI with Sony AI

We want to hear from those of you who have a strong desire
to shape the future of AI.